|
From: Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...> - 2019-06-19 19:40:19
|
Am 19.06.2019 um 00:36 schrieb Patrick Dupre: > I do not have a 3D cloud of points, just 2 sets of points (same length) with the > same x, Whether you admit it or not: that _is_ a cloud of points in 3D space. It's just represented a bit disjointedly. > I "just need" to minimize the sum of the square between a given function > and a set of data (which depend on 1 parameter). And that's, again, where this fails to make sense. If something depends on a parameter, it's not a set of data --- it's a function of said parameter, and the actual data. Just like it's normal for the model function of a fit. Your linear combination of y1 and y2 is a projection of the (y1,y2) plane onto a straight line rotated at angle \theta. Then you compare this projected value to a function depending on x. In the end, this means the function you need to minimize would actually be one of three variables, something like projection(theta; y1, y2) - function(a, x0; x) = min! or possibly projection^2(theta; y1, y2) - function^2(a, x0; x) = min! |