Re: commit 9d0f14

[sfeam <sf...@us...>]

On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 19:39:55 sfeam via gnuplot-beta wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2018 10:34:14 Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> >  [9d0f14] (HEAD, master) by Ethan A Merritt Ethan A Merritt
> > 
> > another try at timestamp.h, this time using build date
> > 
> > The Makefile rule for timestamp.h was broken when we switched from
> > cvs to git, since it relied on ChangeLog always being current.
> > Proposed replacement rules have so far failed to work for out-of-tree
> > builds or builds from a snapshot rather than a full git clone.
> > This attempt simply uses the current build date, which admittedly may
> > not be newer than the last-modified date but at least has the virtue
> > of not depending on git.
> > 
> > 
> > However, git date reflects last commit date and not newer than build date.
> > Build date is not later than the last commit date.
> > It is usually newer than the last commit date.
> 
> Yes.  The text of the commit message was wrong.
> Sorry.
> 
> I wish there was a way to edit commit messages afterwards.
> That is the thing I dislike the about about git so far.

       s/dislike the about about/dislike the most about/

> You cannot go back and fix typos or errors in the commit
> messages.

    like that :-)


> 	Ethan
> 
> > 
> > Tatsuro
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> gnuplot-beta mailing list
> gnu...@li...
> Membership management via: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta