Re: Update on the branch surgery

[Eric S. R. <es...@th...>]

Daniel J Sebald <dan...@ie...>:
> 4.2: Yes, I think I'm wrong there, having a second look.
> 4.6: I think I could go along with your choice on this one as well.

OK.  I'm working on 4.0. I've run into a minor bug in reposurgeon that
I need to fix.

> >I'm going to to do some more analysis on the 3.7 branch, but the odds
> >that we'll have to write it off look pretty high.
> 
> I'll look at this a bit more.  For those with historical knowledge, I'm
> going to write some checkin comments here that come from searching,

I'll want those to patch in, of course.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.