Re: Conversion f2065aa26012a4be6f4c65e4bcdde2d21ae9ccb3

[Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...>]

Am 19.10.2017 um 01:30 schrieb Eric S. Raymond:

> Next question is, shall I nuke the tags that don't refer to a gitspace
> revision?  Checking these out probably won't reflect what was intended, due
> to missing CVS tags in some masters that should have them.

Most of those can go, but some, IMHO, do deserve being kept, if only on 
a 'best-effort' basis.

Basically, all tags with a date stamp in their name really should go.

 > GNUPLOT_RELEASE_3_7_0
 > GNUPLOT_RELEASE_4_0_0
 > GNUPLOT_RELEASE_4_0_1
 > GNUPLOT_RELEASE_4_0_2
 > Release_4_6_3

These, OTOH, really have to be kept.  If they're no longer viable in the 
CVS repository, that is a problem worthy of attention all by itself. 
Could you elaborate what's wrong about them?