Re: Trial git repo is back up

[sfeam <sf...@us...>]

On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:01:45 Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Daniel J Sebald <dan...@ie...>:
> > On 10/16/2017 01:17 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > >Trial git repo is back up, with the conversion bug I previously noted fixed.
> > 
> > Also, the branches are tags are not in the repository, at least not in the
> > conventional way.  In neither git-gui, gitk nor gitg are there any branches
> > listed other than "master" and "origin > master".  It could be there is some
> > fragments of branches though.  In gitk I look at the visual, colored
> > branches.  There are no bifurcations, but there are occasional colored lines
> > appearing that then go away.  I suspect that those lines are supposed to be
> > the branches.  I'm attaching a small portion of a screen shot illustrating
> > how the line changes color rather than splitting out into branch.
> > 
> > My guess is that all the changeset info is there, but the labels that
> > associate branch names with the SHAs are missing.
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> 
> CVS branch labels turn into git lightweight tags. Look at the output
> of git tag -l to check whether any tags actually got lost in the conversion.
> 
> The way gitk displays these (or doesn't) is confusing - I've never quite
> understood its rules.  Adding the --tags option shows more of them.

I'm not seeing any tags or branches at all. 

himeji [15] git pull
Already up-to-date.
himeji [16] git branch --list
* master
himeji [17] git tag --list
himeji [18] 


	Ethan