Re: Trial git repo is back up

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

On 10/16/2017 01:59 PM, Ethan A Merritt wrote:
> On Monday, 16 October, 2017 13:42:30 Daniel J Sebald wrote:
>  > On 10/16/2017 01:17 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>  > > Trial git repo is back up, with the conversion bug I previously 
> noted fixed.
>  >
>  > Generally, cloning seems to take longer than I had expected, given
>  > gnuplot is a rather lean project. It could be that SourceForge is just
>  > slow. The cloning seems "chunky" in the respect it loads a bunch of
>  > objects then sort of slows down; speeds up again, slows down.
>  >
> 
>  > I don't see any authorship mapping; everything seems to appear as the
>  > committer is the author. For example, I've searched "git log" for
>  > "Sebald" and only see my name appear in ancillary comments. Never is my
>  > name/address as gotten from the ChangeLog record in the authorship line.
> 
> I see separate authorship attached to many of the commits,
> but yes I agree that in your case it doesn't seem to have been picked up.
> 
> E.g.
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/git-main/ci/ef67fa09f12cd5f4cc869f7231d9e1f9b14c43a0/
> 
> your name shows in the associated ChangeLog entry but
> has not been propagated to the patchset itself.
> Same for the next 5 most ChangeLog entries with your name.
> So it does seem that your name in particular is failing to trigger a
> match event in the annotation process.

There are probably more.  For example

<sfeam!2015-09-11T19:48:01+00:00Z> 2015-09-11 Akira Kakuto 
<ka...@fu...>

doesn't appear in the log either.

Dan