|
From: Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...> - 2017-10-11 20:10:29
|
Am 11.10.2017 um 19:01 schrieb Ethan A Merritt: > I do not know which email address Hans-Bernhard Broeker would prefer > > broeker = Hans-Bernhard Broeker <br...@ph... > <mailto:br...@ph...>> Europe/Berlin My physik.rwth-aachen.de address is gone, and has been for a while. I've kept using it as the check-in address out of tradition, mainly. Please use broeker .at. users.sourceforge.net, instead. > > 3. I'm not clear on what ought to be excised from the repo. HBBroeker > > mentions dropping the faq module. Someone else (I think Mojca) had > > a pre-conversion sript that stripped out some stuff. A set of excisions > > you guys agree on - ideally expressed as a pre-conversion script > > modifying the repo - is one thing we need. Using reposurgeon, the 'faq' module is already excluded because its generated Makefile rule for SourceForge inputs only pulls one module at a time, so there's nothing to excise. If anything, this module might best be converted independently, and the resulting git repo plunked into the new gnuplot git repo, e.g. into docs/old. > > there were some files on ther gitspace side that weren't in CVS (probably > > due to a botched CVS delete). This needs to be further investigated. I didn't mention those before because I'm convinced the reconstruction is actually better than the original in this case. There are a date range of old tags/branches (BETA_347_980818 ... BETA_349_990114, GNUPLOT_RELEASE_3_7_0, GNUPLOT_3_7_0_2 to GNUPLOT_3_7_0_3, and GNUPLOT_990126 ... GNUPLOT_990317) for which the reconstructed git repo has a subdirectory docs/ps But the comparison didn't find it in its CVS checkouts. That folder did exist between 1998-07-21 and 1999-03-18, then it was copied to docs/psdoc, and the original dropped. So the archives for these files are now in gnuplot/docs/Attic/ps/Attic/*,v Looks like CVS can't really cope with subdirectories inside an Attic. FWIW, cvs2git also rejects this: Directory cvs/gnuplot/docs/Attic/ps found within Attic; ignoring cvsconvert has effectively the same result: git tags/branches from that date range report five gitspace-only files in that folder because CVS fails to express files that should have been there. |