Re: 5.2 rc2 tarball now available

[Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...>]

default terminal size

windows: depends on resolution on the current setting ?


Am I right?

Tatsuro



----- Original Message -----
> From: Daniel J Sebald <dan...@ie...>
> To: gnu...@li...
> Cc: 
> Date: 2017/7/5, Wed 04:31
> Subject: Re: 5.2 rc2 tarball now available
> 
> Also, I'm wondering about the default terminal sizes:
> 
> wxt: 640x384
> qt: 640x480
> x11: 640x450
> 
> not that it matters much; it's just that the WXT terminal test output 
> looks vertically scrunched compared to Qt.  Other terminals such as PNG 
> use 640x480 default.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On 07/04/2017 02:17 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
>>  On 07/04/2017 01:33 PM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:
>>>  On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:12 PM, sfeam <sf...@us...
>>>  <mailto:sf...@us...>> wrote:
>>  [snip]
>>>  Here is with dejavu sans mono 9 (this is actually the best fit I could
>>>  get --
>>>  it gets worse for either smaller or bigger sizes).
>>>  ​(This is still on Gnome desktop).​
>> 
>>  I notice in the example test plot that people have sent that there is an
>>  extra space between the terminal name and the "terminal test".  
> How
>>  about the change in the attached diff file to make the terminal name
>>  italic-bold and 1.5 times larger to illustrate multiple font features?
>>  That looks pretty good and highlights the terminal in question, plus it
>>  tests whether the user has a bold/italic font.
>> 
>>  Dan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> gnuplot-beta mailing list
> gnu...@li...
> Membership management via: 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
>