|
From: sfeam <sf...@us...> - 2017-07-04 18:00:02
|
On Tuesday, 04 July 2017 08:59:56 sfeam via gnuplot-beta wrote:
> On Tuesday, 04 July 2017 17:26:11 Petr Mikulik wrote:
> > ***
> >
> > Is caca still experimental?
> > It's just fun, but it's nice, mouseable and it seems to work, so I propose to
> > have it not experimental.
>
> Good point.
> Also I have just noticed that the caca terminal documentation
> is not always included in user manual.
>
Hmm. Maybe it still needs the EXPERIMENTAL warning.
I have not tried the caca terminal for a while, but here is what I see
when testing -rc2:
driver type raw: Segfaults immediately
(divide-by-zero because height and width are 0)
driver type ncurses: Many garbage characters in output stream
(incorrect handling of TERM setting?)
driver type x11: Font problems, many characters appear as
an empty box. Usable but could be better.
I have lib64caca0-0.99-0.beta18.10
Do you have a more recent version?
In any case I will make sure the documentation is included in the
user manual for 5.2
Ethan
|