|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2017-04-14 17:27:00
|
On 04/11/2017 12:00 AM, pl...@pi... wrote: > On 10/04/17 23:25, Ethan A Merritt wrote: >> Zooming is a >> random thing, so there's no way the person who places the manual ticks >> can anticipate what adequate annotation might be. > > The zoom is random but presumably the ticks have some systematic basis. > > What is kind of situation where manual ticks are needed? Is the > solution to this to be able to supply some kind of non-auto rule for > tick placement? Very general. The application just wants to have the ticks placed according to its rules, I guess. What I meant by random is not the tick placement, but the box that the user selects to zoom into. There's no way for whomever manually places the ticks to anticipate, say, more denser ticks in an area the viewer might look at more closely, i.e., zooming is really something only gnuplot controls. So if the rule is to go to auto-placement in zoom mode, and back to manual placement when leaving zoom mode it might be just fine. Perhaps one could argue that if the user zooms in just a fraction to cut of some portion of the view, say, zoom 0.95 of the view, then the ticks might jump to something different...or maybe the programmer doesn't want any ticks and when zooming the ticks re-appearing might be undesired. Maybe there is rare cases where auto-ticks in zoom are unwanted. Dan |