|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2016-07-19 06:30:14
|
On 07/19/2016 12:04 AM, Jun T. wrote: >>> It seems gnuplot uses about 0.5GB of memory for nonlinear3.dem. > > qt or wxt uses much smaller amount of memory. > > As for the CPU usage, Aquaterm.app uses about 95% of cpu while gnuplot uses 5 to 10% > (100% means one cpu core is fully used). So it seems gnuplot creates large amount > of data and send it to Aquaterm.app, while the latter uses large amount of cpu > to process the data. > > I will do some profiling later (if I have some time). > >> I'm still surprised that this takes so long. If none of the demos in 'image.dem' and 'image2.dem' are glacial-pace slow, > > They don't use the 'pixels' option for plot. That's true. But they do use the same polygon code ultimately. > Just the following command (without any scaling etc.) takes a long time: > > plot 'blutux.rgb' binary array=(128,128) flipy format='%uchar' with rgbimage pixels How long does the following plot take?: plot 'blutux.rgb' binary array=(128,128) flipy rotation=30d format='%uchar' with rgbimage Dan |