Re: 'nohidden3d' option behavior

[Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...>]

Guys,

is it possible you've just totally forgotten about 'set surface explicit'?

It seems 'hidden3d' was never told about it, but in principle, that's 
the command that should make the change Dan is looking for, i.e. it 
could sensibly be expected that

	set surface explicit
	set hidden3d
	splot x*y w surface, x*sin(y) w lines

should yield a plot where the first graph is a hidden (and hiding) 
surface mesh, whereas the second is not just the usual pair of wire grills.