|
From: Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...> - 2015-06-29 04:12:46
|
----- Original Message ----- > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA >> To: tmacchant3 Daniel J Sebald >> Cc: gnuplot-beta> Date: 2015/6/27, Sat 13:13 >> Subject: Re: speed of qt terminal >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > > <snip> > >> Ubuntu 14.04 (LTS) amd64, Qt 4.8.5, nvidia-304 >> >> Qt QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM non-specified a litte bit slow >> QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM=raster normal almost the same as X11 >> QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM=opengl does not work >> >> X11 normal >> wxt rather faster than qt and x11 >> >> Perhaps speed of qt on this test depends strongly environments. >> >> Tatsuro > > > I have rebuilt gnuplot-5.1 with qt5 (qt5.2.1) on Ubuntu 14.04 amd64. > QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM has no mean on qt5 > > Test > splot 'blutux.rgb' binary array=(128,128) flipy format='%uchar' > using 1:2:3 with rgbimage > > I cannot test quantitatively. > To be honest qualitatively I cannot feel distinguishable differences > on mouse operation of a plot between three terminals (qt, wxt, and x11). > > Perhaps this is due to my PC is rather old. > (The nvidia driver version is 304.) > For make check, qt is the fastest. time GNUTERM=qt make check real 0m22.559s user 0m8.834s sys 0m0.883s time GNUTERM=wxt make check real 0m34.771s user 0m23.197s sys 0m1.901s time GNUTERM=x11 make check real 0m30.643s user 0m8.574s sys 0m1.582s Tatsuro |