|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2015-06-27 05:47:32
|
On 06/26/2015 11:04 PM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Daniel J Sebald >> To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA >> Cc: gnuplot-beta >> Date: 2015/6/27, Sat 09:22 >> Subject: Re: speed of qt terminal >>> Daniel. >>> Can you show me a short script at which qt terminal is rather slow? >>> >>> I would like to execute it on windows and ubuntu PC. >>> >>> Tatsuro >> >> Try something like: >> >> cd '<buildpath>/gnuplot/demo' >> set term qt >> splot 'blutux.rgb' binary array=(128,128) flipy >> format='%uchar' using 1:2:3 with rgbimage >> >> [rotate the image using a mouse] >> >> set term x11 >> replot >> >> [rotate the image using a mouse] >> >> If you want, exit, re-launch and try >> >> cd '<buildpath>/gnuplot/demo' >> set term wxt >> splot 'blutux.rgb' binary array=(128,128) flipy >> format='%uchar' using 1:2:3 with rgbimage >> >> On my system there is a very large difference in redraw speed with Qt. Granted, >> it could be the data transfer that is slow and rendering is fast, don't >> know. Also, on my system, the wxt terminal will show a bad aliasing bug when >> the image is rotated so that it is orthogonal to the window borders. >> >> Dan > > > On windows > > > Qt very slow > wxt not slow not fast > windows fastest No surprise there, I guess; Windows being the fastest. > If QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM is set to native, qt terminal is incredibly slow. That must be what my system is defaulting to. > Qt QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM non-specified a litte bit slow > QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM=raster normal almost the same as X11 > QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM=opengl does not work > X11 normal > wxt rather faster than qt and x11 > Perhaps speed of qt on this test depends strongly environments. Yes, also different from what either Ethan or I have found. Dan |