Re: gnuplot 5.0.1?

[Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...>]

----- Original Message -----
>From: sfeam 
>To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
>Cc: gnuplot-beta
>Date: 2015/6/7, Sun 14:25
>Subject: Re: gnuplot 5.0.1?
> 
>
> 
>On Sunday, 07 June 2015 Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tma...@ya...> wrote:
>> The gnuplot web site announces that ver. 5.0.1 is released.
>> 
>> http://www.gnuplot.info/ReleaseNotes_5_0_1.html
>> 
>> 
>> However, on the sourceforge site does not contain 5.0.1 contents.
>> 
>> Is this mere delay of sourceforge site?
> 
>Karl Ratzsch requested that we look at Bug #1594 before releasing 5.0.1 
>There has been some discussion, so I have waited to learn if
>there is agreement how it should be fixed.
> 
>Right now I am leaning towards restoring 4.6.6 behavior (second bracketed
>range applies to column 2 of input data, which makes sense, and that
>column is called z, which makes no sense to me but it's been like that
>for 5 years). I will also print a warning line to the console
>and to the log file stating exactly what is done, if anything, to
>filter input based on the range of the independent variable.
> 
>The output in the log file would look like this:
> 
>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>FIT:    data read from 'lcdemo.dat'
>format = z
>Warning: using last bracketed range to filter input data lines
>based on value of the independent variable in column 2
>independent variable range restricted to [1.02700 : 1.05000]
>#datapoints = 14
>residuals are weighted equally (unit weight)
>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> 
>If people are OK with that I will prepare a release tarball tomorrow
>containing that one change from today's cvs.
>If there is no agreement, I will prepare a release tarball that does
>not contain a fix for Bug #1594 but will add it to the "KNOWN ISSUES"
>section of the release notes.
> 
>best regards,
> 
>Ethan
> 
Thank you for your quick response.
I understand situation.

I will wait a new release come up.

Tatsuro