|
From: Ethan M. <eam...@gm...> - 2015-02-09 20:15:35
|
Ah, sorry, so what I really misunderstood was your statement "I do see the difference with and without antialiasing". I thought you meant you saw the same asymmetry with and without antialiasing. So I take it we now agree that the problem is with qt's antialiasing. But I am mystified about the asymmetry in the x11 screenshot. I can't reproduce that. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Elias Assmann <eli...@gm...> wrote: > On 02/09/2015 06:34 PM, Ethan A Merritt wrote: >> >> On Monday, 09 February 2015 01:24:00 PM Elias Assmann wrote: >>> >>> I now managed to compile gnuplot 5 against Qt5 on my laptop (the second >>> machine I referred to), and I do see the difference with and without >>> antialiasing. >> >> >> Maybe I'm still not understanding fully what you mean by asymmetric. >> Here is an enlargement of your attached screenshot qt_no-antialias.png. >> To my eye the '+' and '*' symbols for point types 1 and 2 look >> perfectly symmetric. > > > Please look at ‘qt_antialias.png’ instead. You will see that the ‘+’s are > symmetric, but the ‘x’s are not (in the +, x, and * markers). > > > Elias > |