|
From: Philipp K. J. <ja...@ie...> - 2015-01-27 04:55:19
|
[snip] > > If you have such a use-case, go ahead and file a > feature request. It should not be too hard to make > the axis structures dynamic rather than static. > The original request for this feature provided examples > from the literature but none of them had even as many > as 7 axes in a single plot. So that seemed > adequate as a default. Failing to check for more > columns of input than expected is purely a bug. Yes, it should definitely be dynamic - and the question is whether there is a better way of doing it than having to enter all cols explicitly. Regarding "references": my book (1st ed) contains an example with 9 columns... Unwin's book "Graphics of Large Datasets" shows one w/ 20 cols (p153). It's a moot point, anyway, because an arbitrary limitation of cols is counter to the spirit of this method. (For practical reasons one may want to limit it, but at a high number - 150 or so.) [snip] > > > > There is one other thing: for practical > > purposes, the ability to highlight a > > single record (or group of records) in > > a parallel axis plot is really, really > > important (obviously the best way is > > with the mouse). I tried to plot only > > a selected record via "every", but with > > a strange results: when selecting a single > > record (ev 170::170::) I get NO graph - > > just an empty canvas. (No warning either.) Did you see this, too? Both the need to highlight records, and the odd behavior with "every"? |