|
From: Ethan A M. <EAM...@gm...> - 2015-01-10 05:16:12
|
On Friday, 09 January 2015 02:14:27 PM David Lang wrote: > I ran into a case that worked with v4.x that doesn't work with v5, namely when > plotting points from a file where the x column is a timestamp and the file had > column headers, v4 seems to have ignored the header column (apparently deciding > that the timestamp was invalid and so throwing out the entire line), while v5 > interprets the timestamp as 01-01-0000 and scaleing the entire plot to include > this date. > I just was surprised when the plot that was working on my production > system didn't work on my desktop (where I had installed 5.0). If this > wasn't something that worked on the older versions, I would just shrug > it off as "don't do that", but the fact that it broke a working config > made me post about it. Can you provide the first few lines from a data file that was handled differently by version 4 than by version 5? It is true that the interpretation of timestamps has changed because version 5 uses a different epoch date, but a zero value should be legal in either version. It's not clear to me why there would be a difference in recognizing a line as a header vs legal input. Also I don't actually see how you could get incorrect interpretation as 01-01-0000. That's the epoch date for version 4 but not for version 5 (01-01-1970). Was that a typo? Ethan |