|
From: Philipp K. J. <ja...@ie...> - 2014-11-07 02:05:52
|
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:54:47 -0500 (EST) Allin Cottrell <cot...@wf...> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Philipp K. Janert wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:16:30 -0500 (EST) > > Allin Cottrell <cot...@wf...> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Philipp K. Janert wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I seem to have a problem building the PDF of > >>> the doc with RC2. > >>> > >>> After > >>> ./configure > >>> make > >>> make install > >>> > >>> I ran: > >>> make pdf > >>> which resulted in an error msg: > >>> ! LaTeX Error: File `picins.sty' not found. > >>> which is funny, because I have a pretty complete > >>> Latex installation (including texlive-pictures). > >>> > >>> I was surprised - at least in my memory I was able > >>> to create the PDF for RC1 without a problem. > >>> > >>> Is this a known problem or am I doing something wrong? > >> > >> This seems relevant: > >> http://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/patches/432/ > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > > > I don't understand Ethan's comment to this patch: > > I have never needed "picins" to include graphics > > (both EPS and PDF) into Latex docs - I do it all > > the time, without picins in my local Tex installation [...] > > As I understand Ethan's comment, he's talking about flowing text > around an included graphic. I find I'm able to do this using > the minipage environment plus \includegraphics from the > graphicx package. I see. I did not realize this. > > It's not difficult to download and install picins.sty individually > but I agree it would be better to avoid it if possible since it's > not part of the current TeX Live de facto standard. Hm, "The Latex Companion" mentions wrapfig, which seems to provide similar functionality, and which is part of texlive-latex-extra. The other question is whether the wrapping functionality is even necessary. Just text, followed by a centered fig, followed by more text seems totally adequate (to me)... But probably not worth spending a great deal of time on (as long as people understand this particular dependency - I did not). Best, Ph. |