|
From: sfeam <sf...@us...> - 2014-11-07 01:53:39
|
On Thursday, 06 November 2014 05:37:52 PM Philipp K. Janert wrote: > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:16:30 -0500 (EST) > Allin Cottrell <cot...@wf...> wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Philipp K. Janert wrote: > > > > > > > > I seem to have a problem building the PDF of > > > the doc with RC2. > > > > > > After > > > ./configure > > > make > > > make install > > > > > > I ran: > > > make pdf > > > which resulted in an error msg: > > > ! LaTeX Error: File `picins.sty' not found. > > > which is funny, because I have a pretty complete > > > Latex installation (including texlive-pictures). > > > > > > I was surprised - at least in my memory I was able > > > to create the PDF for RC1 without a problem. > > > > > > Is this a known problem or am I doing something wrong? > > > > This seems relevant: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/patches/432/ > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > I don't understand Ethan's comment to this patch: > I have never needed "picins" to include graphics > (both EPS and PDF) into Latex docs - I do it all > the time, without picins in my local Tex installation: > just > \usepackage{graphicx} > and > \includegraphics{...} > > In any case, apparently it is NOT a regression (I > am correcting myself here): upon further research, > I do not think I ever built gnuplot.pdf myself. > > Nevertheless, I wonder whether we should get rid of > this odd dependency. If you can find or create an adequate replacement for picins, feel free to contribute. I have not found anything suitable. Ethan |