|
From: Philipp K. J. <ja...@ie...> - 2014-11-07 01:38:00
|
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:16:30 -0500 (EST) Allin Cottrell <cot...@wf...> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Philipp K. Janert wrote: > > > > > I seem to have a problem building the PDF of > > the doc with RC2. > > > > After > > ./configure > > make > > make install > > > > I ran: > > make pdf > > which resulted in an error msg: > > ! LaTeX Error: File `picins.sty' not found. > > which is funny, because I have a pretty complete > > Latex installation (including texlive-pictures). > > > > I was surprised - at least in my memory I was able > > to create the PDF for RC1 without a problem. > > > > Is this a known problem or am I doing something wrong? > > This seems relevant: > http://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/patches/432/ Thanks for pointing this out. I don't understand Ethan's comment to this patch: I have never needed "picins" to include graphics (both EPS and PDF) into Latex docs - I do it all the time, without picins in my local Tex installation: just \usepackage{graphicx} and \includegraphics{...} In any case, apparently it is NOT a regression (I am correcting myself here): upon further research, I do not think I ever built gnuplot.pdf myself. Nevertheless, I wonder whether we should get rid of this odd dependency. Best, Ph. > > Allin Cottrell |