|
From: Ethan A M. <sf...@us...> - 2014-10-24 22:20:10
|
On Friday, 24 October, 2014 15:17:01 Daniel J Sebald wrote: > > One thing to be careful of is the fact that saving to PDF (which is > certainly welcome in my opinion because the first word of PDF means > "portable") in the Qt terminal isn't using the PDF terminal. There are > no colors in the PDF output via Qt Weird. I get a perfectly normal full-color PDF. > Do we want as setup in which the interactive terminals use the > PDF terminal, or a setup in which the interactive terminals use their > own custom PDF output? I have been thinking that it would be nice to have build options for two flavors of gnuplot. gnuplot+Qt no dependence on cairo or wxt svg pdf png output via the Qt libraries default terminal is qt gnuplot+wxt no dependence on Qt libraries pdf png output via cairo (can it do svg?) default terminal is wxt Either of these options could also do away with dependence on libgd, so long as people can live without gif/jpeg output. Given that it looks like wxt3 is causing problems for people who are building on bleeding edge linux systems (or building on OSX), the qt-only build option could become important. Ethan |