|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2014-02-02 20:04:32
|
On 02/02/2014 01:32 PM, sfeam wrote: > Hi all, > > I recall from several past threads on the list that some people have been > avoiding the qt terminal because its rendering speed, particularly for > interactive 3D plots, was slower than x11 or wxt. > > Jérôme Lodewyck's recent revisions to the qt driver have changed that > dramatically. Here are timing for the execution of "all.dem" under linux > (64-bit, qt5). I see about the same improvement for 32-bit, qt4. > > 4.7 all.dem > =========== > user system clock > 4.7 qt (old) 4.973u 0.433s 0:24.91 21.6% > 4.7 x11 5.623u 1.364s 0:20.40 34.2% > 4.7 wxt 13.845u 1.239s 0:15.58 96.7% > 4.7 qt (new) 4.925u 0.427s 0:07.95 67.1% Looks good. What are "user" and "system"? Dan |