|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2013-04-04 18:54:41
|
On 04/04/2013 01:38 PM, Ethan Merritt wrote: > I'd still like to know what the origianl rationale was for > choosing 2000 rather than 1970. I know plenty of problems that > this choice caused, but what problems did it solve? > Are they still relevant? The threat of planetary collapse due to the millennium time change? Dan |