|
From: Arun P. <ape...@lb...> - 2012-12-10 02:28:07
|
On 12/09/2012 02:03 PM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: > On 08.12.2012 21:00, Arun Persaud wrote: > >> according to http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.3781 page 42 (between formulas D7 >> and D8) gnuplot outputs the wrong errors when errors in the raw data are >> used during the fitting process. > > It's a good deal less simple than the author of that paper makes it out > to be. The error reported by "fit" (as of the current development > version: in its default state) only differs from the result desired by > Mr. Young in the case where the data errors are clearly _not_ adequate, > yielding a reduced chisq way off target. Reporting the errors he wants > would do the user an even bigger disservice in those cases than what > gnuplot does now. > > As a matter of fact, the Particle Data Book itself, possibly one of the > biggest fitting jobs regularly performed in all of physics, uses the > exact same procedue as gnuplot in those cases where the fits are too bad > to be taken at face value. Ok, just wanted to make you aware of this. Thanks for looking into it. cheers Arun |