|
From: Thomas S. <t.s...@fz...> - 2012-08-30 07:12:51
|
you need the arrows in the 1st plot only, so unset arrow before doing the 2nd plot. JamesBrown wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have the following problem: > In a script file (attached below) I set a single arrow like > > set arrow 1 from 24.5, -4.3015 to 23.05, -4.30605 nohead lw 2 > > but instead giving the desired arrow this command outputs an arrow plus a > strange vertical line across the whole graph. > I have a similar problem with set arrow 2, but with arrows 3, 4 and 5 > everything is alright though the command are the same. > It looks like this strange behavior for the arrows 1 and 2 strongly > depends on the y-coordinate of the initial point. > > I have now idea what is happening. > Could please anyone help me with this problem? > The script file, the file with data for plotting and the output image > file are attached below. > > Thank you in advance, > Sincerely Yours, > James > > P.S.: > my gnuplot version: Version 4.4 patchlevel 2 > system details: OS: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.11-desktop i686 > System: openSUSE 11.4 (i586) > KDE: 4.6.00 (4.6.0) "release 6" > computer: laptop Asus X72J > http://old.nabble.com/file/p34348260/UTF-8BZW5lcmd5X2NvbnZlcmdlbmNlLmpwZw.jpeg > http://old.nabble.com/file/p34348260/energy_convergence.gnu > energy_convergence.gnu > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problems-with-%22set-arrow%22-command%3A-instead-single-arrow-it-produces-in-addition-a-vertical-line-across-the-whole-graph-tp34348260p34348275.html Sent from the Gnuplot - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |