Re: unexpected behavior of "do for"

[Petr M. <mi...@ph...>]

I would strongly prefer no output for
	do for [i=3:1] { print i; }
I consider one-line output as a bug.

Note -- also Octave/Matlab produce no output:
> for i=1:3 ; i, end
i =  1
i =  2
i =  3
> for i=3:1 ; i, end
>

---
Petr