|
From: <pl...@pi...> - 2012-01-20 21:09:32
|
On 01/20/12 20:29, Ethan Merritt wrote: > I gave two examples where this is (I think) the correct thing > to do, but I can easily imagine that there are other cases where > it is not necessarily the best thing to do. Perhaps being > inside an iteration loop is one of these cases. The two examples you gave make sense. this has been the case previously and works well. The iteration loop would probably create equally unexpected results if it started doing full evaluation. All I was suggesting is that the substitutions that are made by iteration are also applied to the title plot "datafile1", "datafile2" , "datafile3" creates a legend datafile1 ------- datafile2 ------- datafile3 ------- I am suggesting that plot for [i in "1 2 3"] "datefile".i does the same instead of: "datefile".i ------ "datefile".i ------ "datefile".i ------ Peter. |