Re: [Gnuplot-info] epslatex and texfolders

[Patrik.Br. <pat...@gm...>]

Hello,

I solved the problem by generating standalone latex files and then eps
figures from the latex file. Use the following terminal:

set terminal epslatex standalone color

and the simply letting latex make a .ps file from that .tex-file. Include
the .ps-file like any other eps figure into you latex document.

I use Notepad++ which lets you run batch files that I have configured to do
all this automatically for me (including generating a pdf file at the same
time) using a shortcut. Very convenient. (I use windows)


atoms.h wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I know this was on some time ago, but I like to bring it up again since I
> don't see a real reason for it being that way.
> 
> The problem is the epslatex terminal: My usual structure of a latex
> document is TEXDOC->(PICS,GNUPLOT) where the latter two are subfolders of
> the main folder conteining the actual tex file. When I use epslatex from a
> file located in the GNUPLOT subfolder i can create the .tex file in PICS
> folder along with the .eps but this .tex file will have something like
> \includegraphics{../pics/somefile} in it and therefore the .eps file will
> not be found by latex. That leaves me manually editing the tex output from
> gnuplot which I feel is silly! Of course, I could use absolute paths,
> however, this is only a temporary fix until I transfer the files to some
> other computer (which happens quite often).
> Anyways, I think it should be fairly easy to create an option for the path
> to the .eps file to be set separately (while the default still could be
> the way it is now, if this path is not set).
> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/epslatex-and-texfolders-tp32137994p32780115.html
Sent from the Gnuplot - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.