|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2011-10-04 16:24:29
|
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 08:43:02 am pl...@pi... wrote: > On 10/04/11 17:28, Ethan Merritt wrote: > > On Tuesday, 04 October 2011, pl...@pi... wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have found what appears to be a defect in variable assignments in plot. > >> > >> gauss0(x)=a0*exp(-(x-pk0)**2/b0)+c0 > >> a1=a0;b1=b0;c1=c0;pk0=-141; > >> add_one(x)=area0=1; > > > > This defines the function add_one(x) > > to be add_one(x) = value of (area0=1) > > = 1 > > So add_one(x) = 1 for all x > > Exactly, so why is area still 0 after having been assigned the value 1 > about 512 times?! Ah. I thought you were asking about the behaviour of add_one(), since its name implies that it performs an addition but in fact it is defined to always equal 1. I wondered if you didn't simply have a typo for "add_one_x = area0 +1". Anyhow... > I reiterate that if I remove the function plot I do get areas=1 after > plotting. This indicates that plot is re-executing area0=0 after the > second data plot and before plotting the function. I don't say this is good/bad, expected/unexpected, bug/feature, or simply confusing, but this is the way it has always worked. Each plot command is evaluated once to detect functions, read in data, and determine plot ranges; then it is evaluated again to fill in function values over the now-determined range; then it is plotted. If there are no functions then the second of those three operations is skipped. See also https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2907028&group_id=2055&atid=102055 Ethan > /Peter. > > > > Any later changes to the value of area0 are not relevant. > > > > Ethan > > > >> plot area0=0\ > >> , datafile using 1:(add_one($2)) w l\ > >> , datafile using 1:(($2)) w l\ > >> , gauss0(x) tit 'fitted peak0'\ > >> > >> print "area0=",area0; > >> > >> I was expecting this to do the assignment area0=0 once and once only > >> before any of the lines were plotted. > >> > >> It is only assigned once for the datafile plots but adding the function > >> plot causes this snippet to print a value of zero , not one. > >> > >> I am inferring that using a mix of data and function plots is causing > >> the initial assignment to be done twice. Bug or feature? > >> > >> best regards, Peter. > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > >> definitive record of customers, application performance, security > >> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > >> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gnuplot-beta mailing list > >> gnu...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta > >> > > > > > > -- Ethan A Merritt Biomolecular Structure Center, K-428 Health Sciences Bldg University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742 |