|
From: Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...> - 2011-09-13 12:54:16
|
On 12.09.2011 05:50, sfeam (Ethan Merritt) wrote: > The chief arguments I see for bumping the version to 5 > (rather than 4.6): > > 1) The code in the development branch has diverged enough from the > code in the version 4 branch that most new patches cannot be easily > back-ported. > 2) There are significant syntax and UI changes already in or queued for > the development branch, notably [...] I consider those good reasons to make a new non-patchlevel release, but I don't see the case for a major version number step. Those should IMHO be reserved for user-visible, _incomptabible_ changes. I.e. as long as basically all scripts written for version 4.0 (or maybe 4.4) still work, I don't quite see a reason to bump to 5.0. HBB |