Re: Citation of gnuplot in a scientific publication

[C. G. <cga...@vt...>]

I have always felt the gnuplot.info name should be canonical. It points to sf for v4 and vt for v6 and is much more portable.

--
Clark Gaylord
cga...@vt...
... sent from HTC Android
    auto-correct is not always my friend ...

----- Reply message -----
From: "Ethan Merritt" <merritt@u.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, Jun 7, 2011 12:29
Subject: Citation of gnuplot in a scientific publication
To: <gnu...@li...>

On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 06:18:18 am Peter Juhasz wrote:
> Dear gnuplot-beta list,
> 
> I want to cite gnuplot in my publication. Is the following reference OK?
> 
> Williams, T. and Kelley, C. (2011). Gnuplot 4.5: an interactive
> plotting program. URL http://gnuplot.info. (Last accessed: 2011 June
> 7)

I have used the following BibTeX entry:


@MISC{Gnuplot_4.4,
 author = {Thomas Williams and Colin Kelley and {many others}},
 title = {Gnuplot 4.4: an interactive plotting program},
 month = {March},
 year = {2010},
 howpublished={\url{http://gnuplot.sourceforge.net/}}
}

	Ethan

-- 
Ethan A Merritt
Biomolecular Structure Center,  K-428 Health Sciences Bldg
University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
gnuplot-beta mailing list
gnu...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta