|
From: Juhász P. <pet...@gm...> - 2011-06-07 18:37:44
|
I agree, but the journal I'm submitting to has a strict policy on reference format: it's either "Author1, X and Author2, Y", or "Author1 et al.", and I have to cite as "Author, year" in the text. Perhaps I should take a leaf out of R's book? They have a recommendation for citation, in which they list the author as "R Development Core Team". In our case "gnuplot development team" would be neutral and it would reflect reality as well. Péter Juhász. On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 08:39 -0700, Ralf Juengling wrote: > That only the originators get credit does not seem fair. Perhaps > don't name any authors? > > Ralf > > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Peter Juhasz wrote: > > > Dear gnuplot-beta list, > > > > I want to cite gnuplot in my publication. Is the following reference OK? > > > > Williams, T. and Kelley, C. (2011). Gnuplot 4.5: an interactive > > plotting program. URL http://gnuplot.info. (Last accessed: 2011 June > > 7) > > > > (I've found one instance of this question in the list archives, that's > > where the above comes from.) > > > > Péter Juhász > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > gnuplot-beta mailing list > > gnu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta > > |