Re: interpretation of fit errors

[Ethan A M. <sf...@us...>]

On Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:01:53 am Bastian Märkisch wrote:
> Does somebody have a better name for the proposed setting on how to 
> interpret data errors? The currently proposed
> 
>   set fit relativeerrors|absoluteerrors
> 
> sounds a bit odd to me. See bug #2956524

I may be missing something, but why not just report both
absolute and relative errors?   The user is free to pick whichever
is relevant to the particular case at hand.   No extra options needed.

	Ethan