|
From: Mojca M. <moj...@gm...> - 2011-02-17 09:59:03
|
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:02, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> Dear list, >> if I remove MacPorts from PATH (I had to do it since I have serious >> problems with AquaTerm), building fails with: > > Out of curiosity why did you remove mp from PATH? A few times I have tried to build a standalone gnuplot (independent of macports), but this time I was doing experiments with AquaTerm. AquaTerm doesn't provide 64-bit binaries and was just experimenting with that. If I build gnuplot with MacPorts then AquaTerm works (however the latest version of gnuplot complains that aquaterm doesn't support transparency and it complains when I build it). But when I use macports, I cannot test if my own build of AquaTerm works (apparently it doesn't, but that's an independent issue). > You can still use > x11 terminal even with MacPorts' build of gnuplot. I'm not interested in x11 (except that I'm lucky to have a working backup terminal when aquaterm fails), but in particular I'm not interested in MacPorts' gnuplot since it doesn't satisfy my needs. > Btw I've tried to use macports to build gnuplot with a default x11 > terminal and I wasn't able to do that, no matter what the env is, > configure manage to set aqua as default terminal. I ended using "set > terminal x11" into ~/.gnuplot . If I uninstall system-wide AquaTerm and only keep the one shipped with MacPorts, gnuplot won't even compile with AquaTerm support, so I always get x11 (for some reason I like AquaTerm more despite many of its drawbacks). Mojca |