Re: temporal snapshot of cvs source is prepared

[Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...>]

On 09.02.2011 12:30, Peter Juhasz wrote:

> But in light of Sourceforge's response to this attack

What exactly do you mean by that?  If you have some concrete criticism, 
let's hear it.  Otherwise I'm afraid I have to accuse you of spreading FUD.

It's hard to see how SourceForge's reaction could have been any better. 
  They've taken the issue as seriously as it gets, and they're drawing 
the _right_ consequences, in favour of the crowd-pleasing ones.  Yes, 
that means things take time.  But this clearly a case where it's better 
to be safe than quick.

> we might want to think about ditching them altogether and move to a
> different service.

Pardon the French, but you're being silly.  Whatever makes you think 
that other companies would fare any better than SF.net, under similar 
circumstances?