|
From: Ben L. <be...@bl...> - 2010-06-04 20:50:20
|
My png's were short and wide (500 pixels x 80k pixels x 4 bytes) so there were no real memory issues. I was using html/php as a front end for my work and it turned out to be a browser limitation. Thank you vary much Thomas. At 7:30 AM -0700 6/3/10, Thomas Sefzick wrote: >the hard limits for terminals which produce pixel graphics are based >on the graphics file format: >GIF: 2 Bytes unsigned for width and height, must be <2^16 (=65536) >PNG: 4 Bytes signed for width and height, must be <2^31 (=2147483648) > >so there is no ~65k limit for PNG files. just check this with 'size >100000,100', >it should work. but you may run into memory problems with a large image >with reasonable aspect ratio, e.g. 100000*75000 pixels with 48bit each >require ~42GByte, this may cause problems... > > >ben.gpt wrote: >> >> I seem to be running into a hard width limit of ~65k for png files >> but have not found any documentation that indicates what the hard >> limits are for various terminals. >> >> Have I overlooked something? >> > > Thanks in advance... -- ------------------------------ be...@BL... Ben Liberman ------------------------------ |