|
From: Mark H. <ma...@po...> - 2010-04-28 20:10:53
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Hans-Bernhard Br?ker wrote: > Mark Hills wrote: > > When using steps/fsteps, is it possible to fill the area under the line? > > No. > > > Using un-filled fsteps means it is difficult to compare two resources on the > > same axes, as frequently one line 'disappears' behind the other. > > But if you fill them, you run a significant chance of making them _impossible_ > to compare, because a filled bar will completely vanish behind a higher one. In my case the graph I would like to be filled is always below, or equal to, the other graph. eg. I want to compare total I/O (line) with cached I/O (filled). The result of using a filled graph and a line makes the graph very clear to interpret. Nevertheless, is it not always the case that the ordering can be used to draw the line over the filled area? Thanks -- Mark |