|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2010-03-29 14:55:04
|
On Monday 29 March 2010, pl...@pi... wrote: > If gnuplot could work around the instability in the libraries it uses, > this would seem preferable to burdening users with playing around with > specific string handling. I'd regard that as a workaround rather than a > solution. You have missed, or misunderstood, an earlier posting. The gnuplot time code does not depend on an external library. I posted the code (from time.c) that it uses to interpret the %y format. The gnuplot code was written last century, and adheres to the closest thing to a "standard" that was available at the time. It has not changed since then, which one can view as backwards consistency or continued foolishness as the case may be. I pointed out the shifting sands of time-handling in libc not to explain gnuplot's behaviour, but just as a additional bit of evidence that the whole area is frought with inconsistency. Ethan |