|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2010-02-21 16:40:37
|
On Sunday 21 February 2010, Tait wrote: > > No complaint if you want to do this privately, but for distribution, are > we allowed to link against readline? Good point. I had momentarily forgotten that the windows version would be provided as a binary image rather than as source. > Gnuplot is not GPL-licensed (and > personally I prefer it that way), and as I just became aware the other > day, it's apparently the FSF's position that linking against readline is > NOT allowed from non-GPLv3 applications. I happen to disagree with them about that. I do not believe that linking to an optional external dynamic library by itself creates a derived work, hence the GPL restrictions are not relevant. But it's a fight we don't need to pick, so let's not. Ethan > Tait > > > ...I have tried link with libreadline in building > > gnuplot for windows. > |