|
From: Philipp K. J. <ja...@ie...> - 2009-09-25 02:24:54
|
Thanks to Allin for pulling some information together. I think this is really useful. Some comments below (after a snip). [snip] > > 1. Clearly, www.gnuplot.info has much more google-recognition than > gnuplot.sf.net. > > 2. Gnuplot (even in the form www.gnuplot.info) is not showing up > as it "should" for some relevant google searches. > > What follows? > > (1) I would say, if we're interested in proselytizing (though, as > we all know, it makes none of us any money!), we should amend the > gnuplot home page (on whatever site[s] it subsists) to explicitly > mention the facts that gnuplot is free (as in free beer, though > not exactly in the Richard Stallman sense) and open source. And we > should also include the term "graphing". And: "data analysis" and "visualization" and ...? > > (2) This is more speculative, but IMO google page rank is quite > dynamic, not necessarily strongly bound by history. That is, I > think that _if_ the gnuplot developers (and I don't count myself > as one, I'm just an interested spectator) were to choose to make > gnuplot.sf.net the canonical site, then the ranking would fairly > quickly adjust to favour gnuplot.sf.net. I think this is true. One thing that seems to affect Google is the way a page changes. I have seen static pages drop from way on high to nowhere at all. On the other hand, I have noticed that pages that have changed tend to come up higher (and Google tends to pick up changes w/in a few days). |