|
From: <pl...@pi...> - 2009-09-24 11:34:30
|
Philipp K. Janert wrote: > I don't think that we need to worry too much about > Google page rank - except maybe for vanity reasons. > > If somebody is searching for "gnuplot", this person will find either gnuplot.info or gnuplot.sf.net, among > the top 10 entries, regardless. It's a VERY specialized > search term. > > Best, > > Ph. > > Hi Philipp, you misread what I posted. Sure, anyone who searches for "gnuplot" will find it. My point is about people finding gnuplot in the first place when needing plotting tool. When I needed such a tool a few years back I looked and did not find anything suitable. I did not find gnuplot. This brings up another point: that gnuplot site content is not coming up in searches anyway. I was looking for such a tool for a long time and only found gnuplot by someone recommending it to me on a forum somewhere. I certainly don't see PR as a "vanity" commodity but a PR7 is an asset that many would pay thousands to have. It seems foolish to dismiss it. It may make more sense to exploit it. regards. > > On Tuesday 22 September 2009 07:39:01 am pl...@pi... wrote: >> Petr Mikulik wrote: >>>> Given that today there is SourceForge, the need to host community >>>> projects on individual's accounts seems less pressing. As I said before, >>>> it would make sense to me to have gnuplot.sourceforge.net be the >>>> "canonical" site (and have gnuplot.info point to it), and to make >>>> Clark's site at VT a clearly designated mirror. >>>> >>>> Votes? Opinions? Discussion? >>> - I think www.gnuplot.info looks more "professional" than gnuplot.sf.net. >>> >>> - The following link >>> http://www.gnuplot.info/demo >>> (notice the missing trailing slash) goes to: >>> http://azog.bioinformatics.vt.edu:49280/demo/ >>> but not >>> http://gnuplot.sourceforge.net/demo >>> >>> - I think the VT site should have index.html with an immediate >>> redirection to www.gnuplot.info. >> That would blow out any advantage of having a well ranked site with >> google. Once it gets a whiff of the redirection it will probably remove >> .info from it's listing and only refer to the target. >> >>> - It don't think the mirroring works correctly -- for example, >>> http://www.gnuplot.info/download.html >>> still announces 4.2.5 instead of 4.2.6: >>> http://gnuplot.sourceforge.net/download.html >>> These problems are happening very often! >> That is presumably something that can easily be corrected. Mirroring is >> not a new idea. >> >> Clearly all efforts should be made to ensure an accurate mirroring. >> >> regards. >> >>> - What are proposals following from this discussion? >>> A. Should www.gnuplot.info be an immediate redirect to sf.net? >>> Would www.gnuplot.info/demo/ still work correctly in that case? >>> >>> B. Could the mirroring of www.gnuplot.info be finally fixed so that it >>> really works in 24 h intervals (or faster)? >>> Would a move to another server in the world help? >>> >>> Any other possibility? >>> >>> --- >>> PM >>> >>> > |