|
From: Philipp K. J. <ja...@ie...> - 2009-09-06 22:21:18
|
On Sunday 06 September 2009 02:54:34 pm Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Sunday 06 September 2009, Philipp K. Janert wrote: > > Apologies. > > > > I simply used: > > set terminal png > > which I assume means the GD terminal. > > Not necessarily, but in your case - yes, since you are linked against > libgd. > > > There have been no changes to my gnuplot > > config scripts, that would explain the observed > > change in behavior. > > > > Here is the output from ldd (slightly trimmed): > > libgd.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libgd.so.2 (0x00007fd16cf65000) > > Unfortunately, that is non-informative. > Could you please look in wherever-it-is/gd.h to see what the actual > version is? 2.0.35 is common, 2.0.36 is bleeding edge. #define GD_VERSION_STRING "2.0.36" But I have seen different behavior (white default bg) before with this same GD lib. I have not updated my Linux install in a year, but have rebuilt gnuplot from CVS several times since then. > > > > In other words, I see the black background only > > for non-transparent backgrounds. > > Email me one of these png images so that I can see what it claims to be. Will follow outside the mailing list. |