|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2009-09-06 21:54:52
|
On Sunday 06 September 2009, Philipp K. Janert wrote: > > Apologies. > > I simply used: > set terminal png > which I assume means the GD terminal. Not necessarily, but in your case - yes, since you are linked against libgd. > There have been no changes to my gnuplot > config scripts, that would explain the observed > change in behavior. > > Here is the output from ldd (slightly trimmed): > libgd.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libgd.so.2 (0x00007fd16cf65000) Unfortunately, that is non-informative. Could you please look in wherever-it-is/gd.h to see what the actual version is? 2.0.35 is common, 2.0.36 is bleeding edge. > > > > The only related thing that comes to mind is that if you create > > a transparent png image, the nominal background (which you don't > > actually see because it's transparent :-) is black. > > That is necessary in order to get smooth alpha-blending. > > I don't think this is it. I have tried it when setting > set t png notransparent > explicitly and the result is black background, but > when I say > set t png transparent > the background is not black, but the typical > checkerboard that my image viewer uses for > transparent images. > > In other words, I see the black background only > for non-transparent backgrounds. Email me one of these png images so that I can see what it claims to be. thanks, Ethan |