Re: enhancing image capabilities of postscript terminal

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Benjamin Lindner wrote:
>>No matter what you do, PostScript will remain a poor choice for
>>storing pixel images.
>>
> 
> 
> I disagree. If one can put the image data into postscript without unduly 
> bloating its size, postscript is a very powerful instrument.

If it is just an image, yes, but the advantage with PostScript is
the ability to add other elements like scalable fonts, arrows, etc.
However, there's the poor alpha-image/blending support; that's
disappointing.

Dan