Re: Can I use the opaque point symbols only in postscript terminal?

[Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...>]

Hello

> Perhaps you are using a modified postscript terminal?
No

 
> In the standard postscript terminal pt 70-75 are 
>  open circle
>  open square
>  open up-triangle
>  open down-triangle
>  open diamond
>  open pentagon

The pt 70 is open but also opauque.  It has line a square edge and inside part of the circle is
painted with white.

In the ps_symbols.ps, we can find #70-75 are opaque.

Please see 
http://www.geocities.jp/tmgpltwin/Files/Files.html

0013 sin64.eps.png set term post eps; set out 'sin64.eps; plot sin(x) w p ps 2 pt 64
0014 sin70.eps.png set term post eps; set out 'sin64.eps; plot sin(x) w p ps 2 pt 70

The differece is pt 64 is transparent squqre but pt 70 is not trasparent within the edge.
Please see points near peaks.  The difference is clear.

I would like to use symbol black edge with with inside not being transparent like pt 70-75.

Perhaps such symbols exist in postscript terminal as far as I know.

Am I correct ?

Regards

Tatsuro







    

> The standard postscript terminal has opaque point symbols at
> pt 5	solid square
> pt 7	solid circle
> pt 9	solid up-triangle
> pt 11	solid down-triangle
> pt 13	solid diamond
> pt 15	solid pentagon
> 
> > My question is that I can use the opaque point symbols only in postscript terminal.
> 
> pt 5 7 9 11 13 are shared by most terminal types, including post, emf, cgm, and png. 
> 
> 
> > When I used the origin, the open symbols were opaque.
> > I would like to use it in the gnuplot.
> > 
> > If the opaque point symbols can be used in only post term, I will use 'pstoedit' and convert
> to emf
> > files.
> > 
> > Anyway I would like only to confirm my recognition.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Tatsuro
> 
> -- 
> Ethan A Merritt
> Biomolecular Structure Center
> University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742
> 


--------------------------------------
Yahoo! JAPAN - Internet safety for children and parents.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/security/