|
From: Mojca M. <moj...@gm...> - 2008-12-23 00:19:37
|
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Ethan A Merritt wrote: > On Monday 22 December 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> Hello, >> >> here are a few suggestions for the new TikZ terminal: >> >> 1.) I would rename gnuplot.lua into tikz.lua or gnuplot-tikz.lua. The >> terminal lua is generic, but gnuplot.lua is TikZ-specific. >> >> 2.) I would require calling >> set term tikz >> or >> set term lua tikz >> and not >> set term lua >> >> Lua is a generic driver and would not tell anything to the user that >> wants to plot something in TeX. > > How about using a scheme similar to the cairo-based terminals > pdfcairo and pngcairo. The current terminal would have the full name > tikzlua, and the short form "tikz" would work This sounds reasonable. Well - that's the design decision of gnuplot team anyway :) > unless/until someone > writes a pure tikz terminal that doesn't use lua (just as the old > pdf and png terminals don't use cairo). (One could of course write a pure TikZ terminal producing exactly the same output. That would be a tiny plus for compatibility, but quite some time investment.) Mojca |