|
From: Ethan A M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2008-12-22 23:53:57
|
On Monday 22 December 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Hello, > > here are a few suggestions for the new TikZ terminal: > > 1.) I would rename gnuplot.lua into tikz.lua or gnuplot-tikz.lua. The > terminal lua is generic, but gnuplot.lua is TikZ-specific. > > 2.) I would require calling > set term tikz > or > set term lua tikz > and not > set term lua > > Lua is a generic driver and would not tell anything to the user that > wants to plot something in TeX. How about using a scheme similar to the cairo-based terminals pdfcairo and pngcairo. The current terminal would have the full name tikzlua, and the short form "tikz" would work unless/until someone writes a pure tikz terminal that doesn't use lua (just as the old pdf and png terminals don't use cairo). > If one writes metapost.lua then one could for example call > set term lua metapost > to invoke that file. > > 3.) I agree that the terminal should return a list of values chosen > for the terminal > > 4.) Help should also be returned via > help term tikz > > Now set term lua help returns something useful, but help term tikz > should be more informative as well. > > 5.) Maybe there could be > gnuplot.lua > that has a list of available terminals, for example a list containing > "tikz" terminal with both terminal name and filename that needs to be > included to make that terminal work properly. > > Mojca (with more comments to come) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > gnuplot-beta mailing list > gnu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta > -- Ethan A Merritt Biomolecular Structure Center University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742 |