|
From: Nigel N. <nn...@gm...> - 2008-10-13 05:13:54
|
[My reply only went to Ethan. Reposting to list.] On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:00 PM, I replied... Hello Ethan! On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Ethan A Merritt <merritt@u.washington.edu> wrote: > On Saturday 11 October 2008, Nigel Nunn wrote: >> Hi wgnuplotters, >> >> The old wgnuplot code maps very easily onto wxWidgets. > > I'm lost. What do you mean "maps onto"? We can replace the Win32 code with wx code. One of the original intentions for wx was to replace a cruddy MFC. This means upgrading Win32 gui code is easy. > We already support wxWidgets on MSWin, so far as I know. It looks like the wx version is attempting to drive a wx gui from a console app. I may have misunderstood this design. As a stand alone solution, this may work, but a more natural approach may be to have a gui wx app driving the gnuplot library code. This allows us to expose gnuplot as a library of plotting routines. Our simulation environment can then drive gnuplot, as we do wtih Vtk. >> After October 25 I will start reworking the current wgnuplot to handle >> plotting duties inside our wxVtk simulation environment. If anyone >> has comments or suggestions (to help make this useful to a wider >> group) please send them in. > > You should probably look at the work Michael Goffioul is doing. > I don't understand this MSWin stuff, but I gather he's re-working the > communication paths for wgnuplot to do away with any need for a > separate pipe-handling program (pgnuplot). > > Ethan thanks for the suggestion! Nigel |