|
From: Shigeharu T. <sh...@ie...> - 2008-08-01 10:52:34
|
shige 08/01 2008
----------------
Ethan A Merritt <merritt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
| > Rather than storing a NULL label and having to test for NULL every time
| > the list of labels is scanned, I think it would be better not to store a
| > NULL label at all.
|
| Now I see there is a difference in the two fixes.
| One way writes a tic mark even if there is no label;
| the other way writes neither a tic mark nor a label.
|
| Normally I'd say that the user could catch the missing label and replace
| it with "" if they wanted a tic mark. But unfortunately you can't trap the
| missing tic label from the command line.
|
| gnuplot> plot 'xtic.dat' using 1:2:xtic(strcol(3)?strcol(3):"")
| non-integer passed to boolean operator
|
| various other attempts at this cause various other error messages.
|
| So it seems we have to choose either no tic, or a tic but no label.
| I don't know which is likely to please more users.
I think your solution that the tic mark is also vanished is
better.
+========================================================+
Shigeharu TAKENO NIigata Institute of Technology
kashiwazaki,Niigata 945-1195 JAPAN
sh...@ie... TEL(&FAX): +81-257-22-8161
+========================================================+
|